The Paradox of Contemporary Paranormal Research Chris Holly's Paranormal World
Chris Holly presents the work of Michael Kundu who has written a penetrating essay about the state of paranormal research. She introduces Kundu's essay with the observation that "(W)e have an endless pit of strange things happening with very little understanding or research being done to discover what, who and why these things occur." She then presents a shortened version of Kundu's presentation, providing a link to the full report later. Kundu gives a brief history of the research into the paranormal, beginning in the 19th century, remarking, "Inevitably, over time, the realization of an emergent absence of quantifiable evidence has largely resulted in the modern reduction of most public institutional funding and continual research." Kundu goes on to note the emergence of amateur paranormalists, as seen on television, saying their efforts have been helpful in raising public awareness, but have "worked to the detriment of the continuing genuine research being conducted in the paranormal field." Does Kundu have any suggestions for repairing the broken status of paranormal research?
Certainly I do.
ReplyDeleteInstitutional groups might commit resources to create and distribute a voluntary 'code of conduct' for amateur groups;
Institutional groups might also launch an aggressive marketing campaign to boost the integrity of the field and recruit groups as their own affiliates (i.e. membership with the ASPR, SPR, or PA family);
University programs could become more proactive in developing SETI-at-Home type analysis programs to increase analysis of data;
Institutional researchers could seek modern PR firms to launch programs to de-mystify their industry;
These are simply some ideas that might be considered.
Michael Kundu
Lake Stevens, WA